Hedge fund investments often fall short
May 21, 2018

Hedge funds often fall short, according to Toronto, Canada-based CEM Benchmarking Inc (CEM), a provider of benchmarking information on pension scheme costs and performance. It cites as evidence the results of a new study on the growth, value and success of hedge funds, ‘Hedge Fund Reality Check'.

CEM says the research provides analysis of realised hedge fund portfolio returns from nearly 400 large global investors. Whereas only a handful of large institutional investors had money invested in hedge funds in 2000 (around 2 percent of funds), this grew to more than 50 percent by 2016 - representing a 25-fold increase.

Alexander Beath, CEM Benchmarking's Senior Research Analyst and lead author of the study, commented: "Institutional investors use hedge funds for a number of reasons, with improved returns, diversification and the promise of risk mitigation the most cited. One problem has always been how to measure success however, with a key issue being that most hedge fund indices are flawed by either failing to offer a fair basis for comparison (e.g., cash plus a premium), or they aren't investable.

"Although some investors have invested in hedge funds because they are supposedly uncorrelated, our research suggests that most hedge funds, at the total portfolio level, behave remarkably like simple equity/debt blends. In effect, it's possible for many funds to buy a passive alternative at very low cost, that still has very similar risk and return characteristics. That is not to say that all performance has been bad. In fact, the research shows an impressive four out of five hedge fund portfolios would beat the CEM calculated equity/debt ‘optimized' index before taking account of costs."

John Simmonds, Principal at CEM continued: "The real story comes when costs are taken into account however. Only 36 per cent of funds beat the CEM calculated benchmark after taking account of fees, a big drop from the four out of five. The funds in our study typically paid 2.2 percent in hedge fund fees in 2016 – and higher still for funds using fund-of-fund structures, which tend to ‘layer in' more fees. After taking account of fees, the research shows the average hedge fund actually underperformed by -1.27 percent."

 

 





This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across assetman.net.

How do I enable cookies in my browser?

Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.

Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.

Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"

Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"

Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK

Hedge funds often fall short, according to Toronto, Canada-based CEM Benchmarking Inc (CEM), a provider of benchmarking information on pension scheme costs and performance. It cites as evidence the results of a new study on the growth, value and success of hedge funds, ‘Hedge Fund Reality Check'.

CEM says the research provides analysis of realised hedge fund portfolio returns from nearly 400 large global investors. Whereas only a handful of large institutional investors had money invested in hedge funds in 2000 (around 2 percent of funds), this grew to more than 50 percent by 2016 - representing a 25-fold increase.

Alexander Beath, CEM Benchmarking's Senior Research Analyst and lead author of the study, commented: "Institutional investors use hedge funds for a number of reasons, with improved returns, diversification and the promise of risk mitigation the most cited. One problem has always been how to measure success however, with a key issue being that most hedge fund indices are flawed by either failing to offer a fair basis for comparison (e.g., cash plus a premium), or they aren't investable.

"Although some investors have invested in hedge funds because they are supposedly uncorrelated, our research suggests that most hedge funds, at the total portfolio level, behave remarkably like simple equity/debt blends. In effect, it's possible for many funds to buy a passive alternative at very low cost, that still has very similar risk and return characteristics. That is not to say that all performance has been bad. In fact, the research shows an impressive four out of five hedge fund portfolios would beat the CEM calculated equity/debt ‘optimized' index before taking account of costs."

John Simmonds, Principal at CEM continued: "The real story comes when costs are taken into account however. Only 36 per cent of funds beat the CEM calculated benchmark after taking account of fees, a big drop from the four out of five. The funds in our study typically paid 2.2 percent in hedge fund fees in 2016 – and higher still for funds using fund-of-fund structures, which tend to ‘layer in' more fees. After taking account of fees, the research shows the average hedge fund actually underperformed by -1.27 percent."

 

 



Free subscription - selected news and optional newsletter
Premium subscription
  • All latest news
  • Latest special reports
  • Your choice of newsletter timing and topics
Full-access magazine subscription
  • 7-year archive of news
  • All past special reports
  • Newsletter with your choice of timing and topics
  • Access to more content across the site